|
|
LiveJournal for Techno Theory.
|
||||||||||
| Wednesday, December 17th, 2008 |
|
||||
|
So sorry if this isn't allowed . . . I'm not very scientifically oriented, but I've got a friend who needs a Christmas gift and he is really intrigued by quantum physics [and how it (dis)proves that there is a higher power]]. It's all sort of new to him - and I'd like to get him a gift that has to do with it or will teach him more about it. Any suggestions? Thanks so much! |
||||
|
|
| Tuesday, December 16th, 2008 |
|
||||||
|
Regulated TMC (Integrated Total Market Capitalization of the Fund Market) I Constant TMC 1. TMC0 is TMC as it were before the first market day of the year started. 2. TMCi is TMC at the end of the i-th day. 3. In the Constant TMC model, TMC at the start of each market day is set to the TMC0 value. All the prices are normalized to the value, multiplied by the factor k = TMC0/TMC(i-1) This model is stable, from the psychologic point of view. To say, there is no reason to take your money out of such a fund market entirely, if you don't actually need them elsewhere. At plague, natural disaster, war - it's stable, in this particular sense of the word. Nevertheless, Constant TMC fund market cases deflation and recession. In the best case - stagnation. II Inflated TMC ( Read more...Collapse ) The Inflated TMC model is a stable model, lacking the major failures of the Constant TMC model. http://community.livejournal.com/web_order/4521.html |
||||||
|
|
| Friday, April 7th, 2006 |
|
||||
|
AECS needs writers for tonight! If you live in the San Antonio area and want to party with DJ Dan and DJ Dee tonight, hit me up on my cell. The perks are awesome and the ladies love the V.I.P., fellas. 805.304.4225 -Steve AECS@publicist.com |
||||
|
|
| Saturday, February 25th, 2006 |
|
||||
|
I'M CALLING FOR A COMMUNITY-WIDE EVALUATION OF MY MUSIC. CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM ENCOURAGED! WWW.EGESTE.NET http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?songs=289314&t=328 Thank you. -Steve |
||||
|
|
| Monday, July 4th, 2005 |
|
||||
|
EGESTE.NET IS UP AND RUNNING!!! Go check out my new music site - FLASH enabled. www.egeste.net -Steve |
||||
|
|
| Monday, April 25th, 2005 |
|
||||||
| I saw this on the news a couple of years ago: A device that generates pure sound and emits it like a laser-beam, focused only in the direction it is pointed. Just to make it more interesting what if one were to take that equipment and format it into a type of glove? With the palm of the hand open one could emit blasts of pure sound at a fixed and focused area. | ||||||
|
|
| Monday, April 18th, 2005 |
|
||||
|
New song on my website for all you who are interested. Egeste - Feel Egeste.CJB.Net -Steve |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
| ( free...Collapse ) | ||||||
|
|
| Tuesday, March 22nd, 2005 |
|
||||||
Hello! I've helped create a new community here on LJ called  discover_zine. It's supposed to be dedicated to the magazine Discover, but really is an excuse to talk science and throw around ideas. If you're interested, please join! [crossposted to other science communities] |
||||||
|
|
| Friday, March 10th, 2000 |
|
||||||
|
Hey guys, i'm required to give a technical seminar as part of my final semester engineering course in college. The subject of the seminar must be something related to electronics.I'd prefer to speak about something new and revolutionary related to electronics.So, any suggestions? Reason I prefer a modern and latest topic is that I am hoping my lecturers are impressed and at the same time are not knowledgable on the topic. We'll have to answer their viva you see... And another criterion is that the content must be moderately technical, and I must be able to understand it .Also, material must be available on the net easily. So, any suggestions??????? |
||||||
|
|
| Sunday, January 30th, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
The incompletness (Gedel) The famous theorem proves the incompletness or inconsistancy of the theories, which do include the predicate calculus and the natural numbers. But what really are that natural numbers in typographical number theory? Since the first attempt to formalise the numbers theory (by Peano), it does include one really unnatural axiom. Namely, it states, that there are no such a thing, as -1. That there is no predesessor to zero. It seems quite natural, when you try to define, what are the natural numbers. And, nevertheless, the addition does imply substruction. Any attempt to introduce one without another should end up incomplete - or even inconsistent. Once upon a time, the exostence of immaginary numbers(square root from -1) was denied just as hotly, as the existence of negative numbers was denied in TNT - and to no avail. The theorem of incompletness, as I see it, just proves that point - and nothing more. It was the "weak" statement. The "strong" statement tells, that the addition implies multiplication, the multiplication implies division and powers, the integer powers imply all other ones(roots including) and thus, any theory, in its quest for the completness in the numerical domain, should include real and, moreover, complex numbers. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Energetic Investment There is an amazing fact in the old good Newtonian mechanics: you don't have to spend any energy to move a physical body(mass). If you do take into an account, that you may move it as slow, as you wish - and, nevertheless, move it, in time, as far as you need - this fact becames more intuitively acceptible. But even at high velocities, you should't really spend any energy, as it may be, in theory, fully recuperated in the end. The usual energy losses are the mere technical detail - quite irrelevant in so far, as the theory is concerned. There are no formula, connecting the transportation of the physical body for the distance S and the energy SPENT - as there are no such connection. And, nevertheless, you should invest some energy for some time - in order to receive the change in position of the phisycal body. So, there shoul be some definite energetic characteristic to the process of locomotion. Lets find it: S = v*t => v = S/t - where v - velocity, needed in order to move to the distance S in time t. E = (m*v**2)/2 = (m*(S**2)/(t**2))/2 - Newtonian formula for the cynetic energy Thus EI = E*t**2 = (m*(S**2))/2, where EI - Energetic Investment, nessasary in order to move the mass m for the distance S. The unit of mesurement - kg*meter**2 As there are other types of locomotion but the classical mechanical(tunnel effect, probably - wormholes, etc.), I do propose the EI as the invariant for all types of locomotions. The invariants and symmetries are the first thing to look for as you study the problem - at least in so far, as the groops theory is concerned. |
||||||
|
|
| Saturday, January 22nd, 2005 |
|
||||
|
Hey all, New song on my website - don't be shy, go check it out. It's a euro-housy-dancy/jazzy type thing. www.egeste.cjb.net  -Stevo |
||||
|
|
| Wednesday, January 5th, 2005 |
|
||||
|
Hyper-Sonic Sound This technology essentially makes the same connection in audio wave travel taht the evolution of the laser did for the emission of light. Imagine being able to broadcast a straight and narrow stream of SOUND like that of a laser that travels in a single beam of it's waves instead of streading out and directing the sound via acoustics. This will re-define audio engineering and will make yet another distinction between digital and analogue. |
||||
|
|
| Friday, December 3rd, 2004 |
|
||||
|
Hey everyone, I use FLStudio to produce tracks sometimes, and I find that FLStudio usually is deficient in the higher frequency ranges, it feels too bass-heavy and empty. It's not an EQ problem because I export aall tracks seperately to master them in SoundForge and arrange them in Acid Pro 4.0. Any suggestions? Also - I've been playing with REASON 2.5 - what the hell do the "Spider" modules do? -Steve |
||||
|
|
| Wednesday, November 24th, 2004 |
|
||||
|
Do we have an active mod somewhere? This community is supposed to be discussing scientific theories, not trance music, yet most of the recent posts have been promotions (also banned under community rules) for some techno music thing. Can we get a mod to delete those posts or police the community or something? ETA: Obviously the community not only has an inactive mod, it's filled with people who think the rules shouldn't apply to them. Maybe I should start posting about all the bands *I'm* a fan of. Lord knows I have plenty of stuff. Anybody who's actually interested in discussing scientific theory, which is what this community is supposed to be for, come over to sciencetheory. It's newly created, and since our mod must be absent or "must not mind" the breaking of the community's anti-promo rules, I figure it can go here. It's only against the rules if you don't get caught, right?
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
INFECTED MUSHROOM LIVE (AND IN VIDEO) FROM CLUB AVALON! Main Calendar with DI.fm crew on the scene! Wednesday, November 24, 2004, Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:00 PM U.S. Western Time On Wednesday night (Thursday morning), November 24th at New York's Avalon Nightclub, LIRAN S (Trancemotion Productions Presents: INFECTED MUSHROOM LIVE New CD release party – “IM the supervisor”. In their fifth album Erez Aizen & Amit Duvdevani bring forth their talents in full force, taking the listeners on a journey into the yet un-explored corners of Trance, proving once again why they are the no.1 act in the world today. Digitally Imported Radio is proud to present a live video/audio feed right from the club. If you live in the New York area, come out and party with us. If you can't make it, then don't worry because we will bring the party to you as always. Simply tune into DI's Trance or Goa-Psy channel and join thousands of "virtual party goers" to hear and see an always incredible Infected Mushroom live session! Experience the video stream in great quality (400k Windows Media) with images of the club live! It's a show not to be missed! Infected Mushroom Website: http://www.infected.co.il Where: Simulcast on Trance Channel & Goa-Psy channel Link: http://www.di.fm/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=67013 |
||||
|
|
| Monday, November 15th, 2004 |
|
||||
|
!!ANOTHER NEW SONG ON TEH SITE!! !!ANOTHER NEW SONG ON TEH SITE!! WWW.EGESTE.CJB.NET !!ANOTHER NEW SONG ON TEH SITE!! !!ANOTHER NEW SONG ON TEH SITE!! -Steve |
||||
|
|
| Sunday, November 14th, 2004 |
|
||||
|
!!!NEW SONG ON MY WEBSITE!!! !!!NEW SONG ON MY WEBSITE!!! www.egeste.cjb.net !!!NEW SONG ON MY WEBSITE!!! !!!NEW SONG ON MY WEBSITE!!! -Steve |
||||
|
|
| Sunday, November 7th, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
hi, i just thought i would introduce myself. my name is john, i'm a twenty yr old english kid, and i failed school miserably. right, since nobody likes the guy who turns up to a party without any beer, i figured i'd ask you all a question: today, a friend and i discussed how, if you placed a spaceship on the north pole, an if you placed a spaceship on the south pole, and set both off at the same time, they would both be moving upwards, even though this was in opposite directions. i was wondering, when does a direction stop being upward and become onward? i believe it is to do with gravity, the minute gravity stops having an affect on you then direction becomes meaningless. but i'm dumb, and i'd like verification or condemnation. thanks. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
LiveJournal for Techno Theory.
|
||||||||||
